Harmonic Price Patterns

SHARK a.k.a TAH wrote:Dear SLS/Admin

As stated by 1st Admin yesterday, if the ownership of articles belong to the respective original author, i request humbly to take my thread Harmonic Price Pattern down and remove ASAP.

Thank you
Shark

SHARK a.k.a TAH wrote:No I mean they can remove my articles for sure.... and leave this decision to 1st Admin or SLS 2nd Admin.

jiggysaurus wrote:

Kohoma baluwath vadey kathay neda? If SLS is attacked forced to leave, who benefits? Is this a very powerful plan from a very powerful forum? Looks like a very gilmart and fib on achchi level thing to do.

Admin wrote:

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

jiggysaurus wrote:

Admin wrote:

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

Nothing to be baffled about, this female tactic of making sudden outbursts and crazy comments and baba level reactions is a tactic used by the powerful gilmart madam. Looks like she has thought her students well. Use of multiple accounts is a tactic used by the all powerful GMNet so how to be sure that this is actually the fish and not the gilmart madam?

Admins should be tough with new accounts that suddenly popped up right after SLS was made Co-Admin. Certain fish may have got a case of sour grapes.

Weather in Abu Dhabi must be very hot, might scramble the charts a little bit. Defa the forum should back SLS as much as possible against powerful peeples who may have hidden gilmart agendas.

Admin wrote:TAH - I feel you have laid some accusations on the forum Admins. Abuse of rep, multiple accounts etc., From what you have I cannot agree with you. I can't understand how you get upset due to these!

As for the deletion part
1) Yes you are the owner of what you posted. Not for the replies that others posted, so the thread will not be deleted.

2) consent will be needed from you to reuse what you have posted anywhere else. Does not mean that Admins have to do whatever you demand with respect to your posts. You are free to edit your posts. That's the best I can suggest.

3) Further this applies to articles authored by you that will belong to you. Not posts that you got from outside and you have given the sources.

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

SHARK a.k.a TAH wrote:

Admin wrote:TAH - I feel you have laid some accusations on the forum Admins. Abuse of rep, multiple accounts etc., From what you have I cannot agree with you. I can't understand how you get upset due to these!

As for the deletion part
1) Yes you are the owner of what you posted. Not for the replies that others posted, so the thread will not be deleted.

2) consent will be needed from you to reuse what you have posted anywhere else. Does not mean that Admins have to do whatever you demand with respect to your posts. You are free to edit your posts. That's the best I can suggest.

3) Further this applies to articles authored by you that will belong to you. Not posts that you got from outside and you have given the sources.

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

Thank You Admin for the swift reply, and really appreciate your work behind the scenes.
FYI this is not the 1st time and fewer instances before too he had done this to indirectly mean by cross referencing.
I am okay with constructive criticism, when some one says HPP works only 10%, what is the proof he has. Let him show the research he did this on CSE.

We were able to detect so many Reversal Zones out of which SAMP 160 LFIN 100-105 TPL 18 VONE 15-16 SHL @8 JKH @180and latest LIOC.

I am not saying this is the Holy Grail, but were able to benefit all of us from Harmonic Trading.

I did not make allegation to the Owners of this forum or You, but certain section using it to their benefit.

If the Neg Reps are given because my stand at that time was different, or my articles posted here are highly promotional by nature or something personally disturbing to one of few, which was btw alright at that time.
Take care of the forum. So far you have been able to maintain it without any blemish, or any issues as far as i have seen it.

There are good gentlemen such as Alchemist Sash RB and others in addition to SLS our preferred choice SLS (whom you elected) & who can help you in the future hands down. Have them on board and fleece out the attitude and arrogant once off the forum without letting them take control in the future.

Anyhow I am Leaving it to 1st Admin or SLS to do what is suitable.

Thank you for the Space given to this thread & Me.

Wishing you all the best.

Shark

Admin wrote:

SHARK a.k.a TAH wrote:

Admin wrote:TAH - I feel you have laid some accusations on the forum Admins. Abuse of rep, multiple accounts etc., From what you have I cannot agree with you. I can't understand how you get upset due to these!

As for the deletion part
1) Yes you are the owner of what you posted. Not for the replies that others posted, so the thread will not be deleted.

2) consent will be needed from you to reuse what you have posted anywhere else. Does not mean that Admins have to do whatever you demand with respect to your posts. You are free to edit your posts. That's the best I can suggest.

3) Further this applies to articles authored by you that will belong to you. Not posts that you got from outside and you have given the sources.

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

Thank You Admin for the swift reply, and really appreciate your work behind the scenes.
FYI this is not the 1st time and fewer instances before too he had done this to indirectly mean by cross referencing.
I am okay with constructive criticism, when some one says HPP works only 10%, what is the proof he has. Let him show the research he did this on CSE.

We were able to detect so many Reversal Zones out of which SAMP 160 LFIN 100-105 TPL 18 VONE 15-16 SHL @8 JKH @180and latest LIOC.

I am not saying this is the Holy Grail, but were able to benefit all of us from Harmonic Trading.

I did not make allegation to the Owners of this forum or You, but certain section using it to their benefit.

If the Neg Reps are given because my stand at that time was different, or my articles posted here are highly promotional by nature or something personally disturbing to one of few, which was btw alright at that time.
Take care of the forum. So far you have been able to maintain it without any blemish, or any issues as far as i have seen it.

There are good gentlemen such as Alchemist Sash RB and others in addition to SLS our preferred choice SLS (whom you elected) & who can help you in the future hands down. Have them on board and fleece out the attitude and arrogant once off the forum without letting them take control in the future.

Anyhow I am Leaving it to 1st Admin or SLS to do what is suitable.

Thank you for the Space given to this thread & Me.

Wishing you all the best.

Shark

TAH

Good that you've calmed down a bit. slstock had made a brilliant point about deleting the posts for which so much effort was put it. It's your choice. In here they will always be your posts and will not be stolen. That was the guarantee that we made and you referred to.

Please read the comments by the others as well. No one has hatred here. These are just effects of what happened so far at various places. See the first few posts you made in this thread.

As an Admin earlier I replied in an administrative point of view and hope you understand.

Let's get back on track, shall we? :-)

serene wrote:

Admin wrote:

SHARK a.k.a TAH wrote:

Admin wrote:TAH - I feel you have laid some accusations on the forum Admins. Abuse of rep, multiple accounts etc., From what you have I cannot agree with you. I can't understand how you get upset due to these!

As for the deletion part
1) Yes you are the owner of what you posted. Not for the replies that others posted, so the thread will not be deleted.

2) consent will be needed from you to reuse what you have posted anywhere else. Does not mean that Admins have to do whatever you demand with respect to your posts. You are free to edit your posts. That's the best I can suggest.

3) Further this applies to articles authored by you that will belong to you. Not posts that you got from outside and you have given the sources.

I'm baffled that you are reacting this way just because of a comment made on a type of analysis instead of defending your position.

Thank You Admin for the swift reply, and really appreciate your work behind the scenes.
FYI this is not the 1st time and fewer instances before too he had done this to indirectly mean by cross referencing.
I am okay with constructive criticism, when some one says HPP works only 10%, what is the proof he has. Let him show the research he did this on CSE.

We were able to detect so many Reversal Zones out of which SAMP 160 LFIN 100-105 TPL 18 VONE 15-16 SHL @8 JKH @180and latest LIOC.

I am not saying this is the Holy Grail, but were able to benefit all of us from Harmonic Trading.

I did not make allegation to the Owners of this forum or You, but certain section using it to their benefit.

If the Neg Reps are given because my stand at that time was different, or my articles posted here are highly promotional by nature or something personally disturbing to one of few, which was btw alright at that time.
Take care of the forum. So far you have been able to maintain it without any blemish, or any issues as far as i have seen it.

There are good gentlemen such as Alchemist Sash RB and others in addition to SLS our preferred choice SLS (whom you elected) & who can help you in the future hands down. Have them on board and fleece out the attitude and arrogant once off the forum without letting them take control in the future.

Anyhow I am Leaving it to 1st Admin or SLS to do what is suitable.

Thank you for the Space given to this thread & Me.

Wishing you all the best.

Shark

TAH

Good that you've calmed down a bit. slstock had made a brilliant point about deleting the posts for which so much effort was put it. It's your choice. In here they will always be your posts and will not be stolen. That was the guarantee that we made and you referred to.

Please read the comments by the others as well. No one has hatred here. These are just effects of what happened so far at various places. See the first few posts you made in this thread.

As an Admin earlier I replied in an administrative point of view and hope you understand.

Let's get back on track, shall we? :-)

Time will be the real healer for most of the issues of our life.

Even i had passed certain period of my life with so much of pain mainly due to i have given the heart to take decisions. It seems those days that i would never over come those sorrows.

But time has passed and i sometime smile to my self considering how stupid i was.

Dont take decisions hastily and always give brain the priority over heart.

Must be very hard but thats how life goes.

SHARK wrote:LIOC i am expecting to hit around 30-29 or 28 .... The Pattern is looking ominous and a possible to complete the target below 30

SHARK wrote:The RSI and MACD can change any moment... not to be taken as a future predicting tool..... macd i use for detecting Divergence Only.
RSI is in Neutral.
Chances are H&S is in the final stages break out confirmation around neckline ......
Good opportunity to collect @30

barba wrote:

SHARK wrote:The RSI and MACD can change any moment... not to be taken as a future predicting tool..... macd i use for detecting Divergence Only.
RSI is in Neutral.
Chances are H&S is in the final stages break out confirmation around neckline ......

Good opportunity to collect @30

This is bull shit from Bull Shark.Experts say never it will drop to 30.Those who wait to buy at 30 will be disappointed

yellow knife wrote:If we look at the predictions and behaviour of sharks investments ,,, I am astonished to see his activities...Shark says he is  waiting to collect LIOC below 30... technically he may be correct.... but can a performing companies share fall below net asset value in a bull market.... I think the members should use common sense in addition to horoscope reading when taking decisions regarding their investments...

However I really appreciate Sharks work of technical side...

barba wrote:

SHARK wrote:

barba wrote:

besthope wrote:

SHARK wrote:Added LIOC & LGL Too ....

I will accumulate

Adey what men shark yesterday telling LIOC comming to 28-30 saying head and shoulder pattern and macd divergences and all and to wait and now slowly buying. hell of a bally joke no men. a tad not fair i thinking no ?

Well said buddy.Bull Shark is a joker.Why did he buy it today if he knows LIOC price is going to dip further

Dear Barba & BestHope

Please read below my comment on another thread...(This was before your comment that was posted 01.08.14 around 5pm)
Quote
Re: Good news for LIOC
Post by SHARK on Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:25 pm

I think You should BUY now @39-40 and later if opportunity come your way BUY further @30
Unquote

Perhaps Barba did not read my previous comment before his/her passing comment on me.....

Thanking you
Kind regards

SHARK A.k.a TAH

Dear Friend Shark it will never reach 30 again and it is out of question. There is no reason for it to fall that level say the other experts. Anyway will keep monitering and if it does fall to 30 I think you are the best expert here. Cheers

SHARK wrote:My Gem is LIOC

1st target 55Rs
2nd target 75Rs

Deal or No Deal

SHARK wrote:I hold 27950 now

SHARK wrote:

SHARK wrote:My Gem is LIOC

1st target 55Rs
2nd target 75Rs

Deal or No Deal

Target 3 = 100Rs

knockknobbler wrote:@  by SalmantheGreat

I welcome  ,your decision to start commenting .It seems you have  spent some time, and done a  "research" type of work for your first post. .
However, Pardon me for pointing this out , I think  your  post  is out of place, it's not relevant here.

We can see lot of members comment on  selection of shares, predict on share prices , (most of the time without substantial facts or basis). We all know , these are merely opinions, these things are not accurate and  can go wrong.  
If I have to say something regarding  a member's  post /comment   ,I'll  write  that, just below  his post /comment  or at least  in that particular thread.
But after some time , why blame the member quoting his predictions/ statements ? I can't understand.
Also, you are referring to some statements of this particular member at some other Forum.  What's the relevance of those things here ?  I can't understand.
We all are writing, with a different identity. There is only a name.  A person can delete change that name or start with a new name. What we should look at...., is  what is written here, not the character  of the  person who wrote.  
Why are we taking matters to heart and accuse  /blame  another person (really a bogus name) ?  I can't understand.

SHARK wrote:

I would like to change my topic from a strong caps to somewhat Speculative Counter that too can give some decent profit on the coming periods.

So i had a look at PCH.N and found intersting 2 signals based on Technical Indicators that is worth having look at it.

Anybody noticed it what i noticed on PCH.N

Well if not so, please look at it carefully and share your comments.

To begin with i am seeing concerted accumulation on this share is visible. Have noticed it. There seem to be no Panic selling RUSH where as expectations on BUYERS side that the counter will start a RUN in near future.

However to be more spicy on the counter i am not discounting further 20c drops to add a twist to the play.

Any1 on board with me.

Post your Targets if so wish Smile And i will share mine soon Smile
Playing with a small quantity though.

The chart will follow later on ....  tongue

SHARK wrote:BUY PCH @40c/30c or 20c

The Drop i was talking 20c = CMP 40c --->20c

Take a look at the MACD and BUY @ 20c

This is a common and fairly reliable signal on REVERSALs

lux2014 wrote:Mr Shark,
Can I point out two things pl?
Is it ok to try to predict such a volatile and 'managed' counter as PCH?
I noted somewhere a prominent broker firm had advised to sell CTC as it's potential is running out due to number of reasons.

SHARK wrote:PCH i hold some qty for Speculative sake.

There must be reasons why Dr S & another Share Holder in Top 2 Positions in Top20 list.

Whilst Doctor took a stake in AINV.

The other 2 companies were pushed from LOW and appreciated on some speculative reasons.
Why PCH has got stucked in 40c.
But if you look at the Chart a buying will confirm around 50c technically. Whilst if you see MACD positive divergence in the making and it seem though some more collection going on around 40-30c and we may see a RUN on the counter afterwards.with positive news.
Speculative Shares thrive in NEWS so it could be something positive that will mark its RUN in coming periods.

So technically some collection is going on based on MACD Bullish Divergence. So for me BUY BUY and BUY until you see panic selling

SHARK wrote:PCH First Trxn was 30c x 1Share - wasnt that something
Last couple of days BIG chunks BUYING at 40c
Few Retailers or Individuals selling 30c probably to collect LOW or Retailers fear of further price drops.

Just watching this game ..   

A Bullish MACD Divergence is a strong Trend Reversal Pattern BTW

SHARK wrote:Dont Invest your hard earned money on PCH.
It is coming down to 30c and  20c probably.

Some fellows are trying to get short term benefits like TWOD.

Dont get caught, and you will loose all your money.

if you have little money then try and buy 20c or 10c max10000 shares or 10000.

Please note you may risk all the money/capital.

because speculative shares you should exit quickly.

SHARK wrote:My advise is for newcomers or seniors ... dont invest in PCH.....

ask the following questions.......

where does PCH as a brand - For me they tried to make a brand, but not an iconic any more, as some one said there are other shops redlinetech,barclays etc

EPF holds shares - we know how they take investment decisions, so for them its peanuts to exit, because they dont care about public money as a EPF PF, they have earned massive as per latest report. so to exit from PCH is nothing.

Why Silva & Dr in top2 - as someone stated earlier (cant remember his or her name) it can have some pre arrangement to show public that Dr bought @1.50 or some level and has a another deal to reimburse a certain amount, this way Dr or the other paying actually Less.

We have seen some shaddy deals by these individual so dont buy expecting huge returns just because silva and doctor in top 2.

they could be using their names to make kill out of PCH status.

poor retailers can be taken for a ride.......

Also there can be some highly questionable individuals who will promote it ..... keep an eye....


Dont even buy if i say so, period I am not holding btw PCH ( some will say PCH did not run so a potential RUN is due) thats how they will promote it without any basis.


Those who promote this share are part of major group of manipulators and want to take innocent retailors for fun ride in a roller coaster.

Kindly bring such posts to immediate notice of Sstar  and other Mods.

Sarabulathwita wrote:

SHARK wrote:Dont Invest your hard earned money on PCH.
It is coming down to 30c and  20c probably.

Some fellows are trying to get short term benefits like TWOD.

Dont get caught, and you will loose all your money.

if you have little money then try and buy 20c or 10c max10000 shares or 10000.

Please note you may risk all the money/capital.

because speculative shares you should exit quickly.

I really like the way you handle this forum as a responsible person. Many thanks for your advise

One of my client lost 6,000,000 ( pension money and other money). he was told to invest in this share mortgaging the house by a broker's friend. I tried my maximum and stop him mortgaging the property. He left me and opened a account with another broker and bought 8Mn shares for 5 accounts (relatives). he sold every thing at a loss (6MN).

Dont get caught to promoters - how they do?????

Promoters get commission for promoting that stock but but I get (-) and (-)

Just think about it. Dont be greedy. These fundamentally good stocks and stocks that were not gone up should be bought


yes. Very valuable advise from Mr. SHARK. Thank u  

Market Sucker wrote:
There are many experts in this forum now like SHARK (Known as TAH in previous days), ROBOTICFX, NZ BOY and many as per today bull market. This situation is just like "LULA NATHI THANA KANAYA PANDITHAYA"
But they were nothing when our real people (SLS, SMALL,MARK,$$$,MONO,TUBAL,SIRIRANGA, etc) build this forum up to this level when it was BEAR run.

Remember everyone is a expert in a BULL market, but real experts emerge when its come to BEAR market. Im extremely against your comments made against MARK in the other thread. You have to understand what they did to this forum before you commenting such bad manner. You may learn more from them if they were here now, sadly we dont have them. Finally now we have puppet experts Sad

SHARK wrote:@Market Sucker

I was in the bear market as well, just to put the record straight regarding my entry.

and predicted several reversals on S&PSL20 precisely, you may go to chart section and see what i stated or Technical Analytical & Charts - Thread 1. Some digging has to be done on to find the relevant posts. for those who were with me, can remember the 113 Fib reversal.

Dont take my word as a proof. you can search thanks.

Your remark lula nathi wale kanaya pandithaya should be re-phrased

lula hitiya waleth mora hitiya habei panditha weda kale nehe lula wage

SHARK wrote:Lula these days promoting PCH for your information out of some theory which no body understand, all is praying some1 will come and rescue by this way trying herd the pigs to his masters

smallville wrote:OMG.. AKA or YAKA caught red handed but still talk like he's innocent..

Another GMnet in the making.. The forum is monitored by these two puppets thru other user names..